I seen a lot of my friends just suffering because their work is so prominent and they struggled for ten years or more trying to get their style just to see someone else parading wearing their face and parading it right
There is nothing stopping and companies from taking whatever you yong from the internet download it and put into their trademark nothing really be putting the whole critique to future of humanity at riskier in the last couple of weeks i spoke too many amazing artists and scientists about my mixed feelings of generated v i
Join need to hear their thoughts my advice to creators and predictions on what’s to come i will be perfectly honest with you i am equally fascinated and terrified by generative i as a graphic designer illustrator an educator i tried to stay on top of any new technology and to that helps sell
Expression and creativity
I still remember the first time i saw the potential in a i used for creating art it was in two thousand and eighteen when i saw the example scott eaten achieved using his model train exclusively on his own photography dataset from his buddies emotion project i never thought that by two thousand
Twenty four we will have tools like me journey that can generate photo realistic images indistinguishable from real photos or art and tools like albany eyes sura capable of generating ultra realistic videos from tax from it’s by now most likely you are familiar with how ai images are generally
Eighteen but in case you are not let me give you a very brief and extremely simplified summary you typing a few words your prompt describing what you want to see and the ai model generates images for you that never existed before for this process to work well the ai model needs to be trained on a massive
Amount of images and their descriptions at the moment the most effective and most widely used data set lay on five be includes five point eighty five billion on curated images crawled from publicly available that sites and cloud storage is this dataset was meant for real
A purposes only but company started to utilize it commercially within a few months after his release that are all kinds of images in this dataset from public domain pictures to a staggering amount of copyrighted work of both that and living artists and a fair amount of explicit content to the creatures of
This dataset didn’t get consent from anyone like collecting these images there was no opting or opt out but says it was meant for research purposes only it didn’t seem to violate any ones right you can get a better idea of the effectiveness and sheer amount of scraping that was used to generate leon five be day
To set by going to have i been trained dot com website you can search the entire training data using someone’s name at domain name or even a key for it for instance you can find out how many images of elephants were scraped off the internet and you can start to see why ai models can generate images of elephants
From any angle any any artistic style this is like scanning someone’s brain to see how well they remembered how an elephant looks only artists with extraordinary visual memory like the late game junkie can come close to this level of familiarity and comprehension or a subject matter without going into the can
Allergies of how deep learning and stable diffusion works here are some important things to understand about text image generative ai models the are designed to generate new images similar to what they have seen during their training once similarly motherly strain on an image it cannot on see it is a bit like you
Human memory but much more accurate and extensive a bit like photographic memory pad with unlimited storage capacity to improve the speed of the generation process all images that are fed into the ai model are compressed that this compressed form of the image or elite and image looks like noise
Is to us but the model is capable of reversing it back to a recognizable almost identical image as the original input this transformation between the original image and to recover the meet after the diffusion process is crucial as this is used as an excuse by ai companies to get around
Existing copyright laws and to allow them to cheat artists out of their rifle compensation
You may have heard of the term data laundering it involves transforming stolen data so that it can be used for legitimate purposes in this instance the original data five point eighty five billion images was collected from the web by nonprofit research groups and then shared with for profit
Companies most people who are having a discussion are unfortunately starting from a business first mindset sell all of the ideas all of the discussion about what should be legal should not be legal our discussions are sort of framed around companies that want to scale up to the millions to billions of dollars of revenue right and
If if you’re going to be that kind of company i don’t think you can just have a charismatic l at the top who thinks that they have perfectly understood the future of technology and that for some reason thinks their bare handed handling of this situation is going to assure the best outcomes for everybody know you need boards that are made up of
Actual artis right not just i’m not not just technology people who stumbled upon a code that happens to make are you need people who are really sort of outside of the situation real stakeholders to help guide these organizations creators of meet your knee one of the most popular text to image generators have been reese
Simply called discussing laundering copyrighted images whilst training there he i model many scientists who worked on developing a i technologies at all so disillusioned by the predatory practices of a i companies used to harm individuals and entire industries there is nothing stopping
Yeah companies from taking whatever you are from the internet download it and put into their trade model nothing really
There’s no legal sadrist and in a way there is no regulatory agencies that as a vessels not allowed a wise it’s such a big deal you might ask that he i’m more those have been trained on copyrighted materials how does this affect the original artists remember what happened to the music industry when napster
I first came out and then with pretty much every other intellectual property once file sharing or torrent sites became available i’m talking about movies tv shows books software games etc or though pirated content is still widely available most industries found ways to combat it
Mainly by streaming that contact the main difference however is that why torrent sites have been hurting mainly large companies and brands generative ai is hurting individuals what is worse is that generative a i didn’t just steal artists‘ work it was created in order to replace them since we are
Comparing ai systems to torrent sites it’s as if you can only download the last season of your favorite show but even generate any number of new episodes or seasons without the consent and input of the show’s creators if they if they were marketing a commercial product
That was solely based on people who opted in they would have a very competitive product they wouldn’t have a partner there were compete directly with artist wrote and like you know this be want to tell people it’s a tool and it’s a tool for artist but it’s not it’s is meant as a replacement for hours
Because they’re trying to directly compete with ours was a market wrote that is not a tool that is a replacement
The only way to have a very competitive extremely competitive product that has the best imagery is to scrape from everyone and anyone one of the main arguments of people using generative ai tools is that they’re generated images only look similar to existing real artwork that was used to train the ai models
They compare this ability of mimicking other people’s work to how artists find inspiration and references here is what loyce from barley or low ish wrote about this many have compared image generators to human artist seeking out the inspiration
These two are not the same my art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists as long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images it is commercial use of my
Art without my consent there are dedicated web sites like this one to help people easily copy any artist style using me journey you can consider these style catalogues for people who are lazy to even research and get to know the artist they would want to copy bobby to put it this way in his video a eyes of
Guilty to copy my style is kind of like after i spent all this effort to climb a mountain once it gets a top everyone else just pops up with that taken sell fees on top of this mountain right beside you and you know that if you didn’t climb the mountain than none of the others could either yet the only compensation that’s given
In his to the ai company even though without my artwork as well none of this would be possible they’re just looking at something and they’re they’re thinking that looks cool i’m who did that i’m gonna keep prompting stuff by lowish right than does not you’re not learning anything you’re just kind of you know it’s cool you don’t understand why
War is gonna wanna keep generally more of it
So that that’s me feels like you’re not really benefiting from anything you’re kind of just
Now playing the slot machine for more from our results but i seen a lot of my friends just suffering because their work is a prominent and they struggled for ten years or more trying to get their style just to see someone else parading wearing their face and parading it right
You might wonder what happens if you want to mimic a specific less known rc style and mean journey doesn’t recognize their name when you’re using it in your prompts well media and the recently introduced the feature called consistent styles which makes it even easier to mimic anyone’s style let me demonstrate this quickly here are some list
Ratios my good friend george dunks created using one or two of these as thigh references me journey can closely emulate georgia style and the whole process takes less than a minute leading an hour anyone can generate hundreds of detail the illustrations in george’s unique artistic style
What this means is that even if his work was inscribed in the first place and used to train the ai model the uploaded style references will help to identify similar artwork in the database and use that to generate something very similar i don’t know if the uploaded images by the user are them
Automatically added to the a model streaming data but i’m pretty sure the are used in some way to improve it if that is the case then users become complicit in data laundering without their knowledge here is what patrick brown has to say about stein mimicry when i confronted him with generated image
She’s using me journeys consistent style feature when i saw this as kind of surprised very shocked each of these were probably just made within seconds compared to if i was to draw something like this maybe like this one i would spend probably at least three days probably putting this together maybe for
Four five including the background fistula like that background for details yeah it does look very i use that to the average i think it would just pass as
The usual spot him in artwork or just a piece you would have thought that it would have been done on us
It is very scary and i don’t like that side of a i to be honest especially when i’m out of certain honest and say hey i want to get this style and then create a full picture and out of thin air
It really does suck to have
Your name or your art style kind of siphoned off and like put through a filter and generated and it’s spit it out in visit a few seconds you know there is a short paragraph about stealing someone’s intellectual property in meet you in these terms of service if you knowingly infringe someone else is intellect
A property and that cost us money we are going to come find you and collect that money from you we my also do all this stuff like try to get a court to make you pay our legal fees don’t do it sanders arts explained the dangers of ai imitating anyone’s work when ai generation
Guns are made to look like an artist’s work this has the potential for reputation damage for forgery for fraud for identity theft and what’s most concerning is that with these models are trained on images of your artwork they are unable to forget it’s almost all of these models are now working with tainted data their generations now all involved copyrighted content which has been
Gathered without the knowledge or permission of the copyright owner it is directly hurting artists with put their passion and their soul into everything that they create only for their work to be scraped from the internet without their permission and used in training yeah models the unfortunate paradox is that the more this thing than rt style is the more successfully a i can
Mimic it additionally the more complex and detailed and artwork is the more likely people will think it is made by a i even when it’s not so generated images mimicking someone style is not only plagiarizing the artist but also makes people doubt the authenticity of any future or paul
Asked were created by the artist
And have been looking at at our for our past twenty years so my life and
Yeah sure sometimes they’re dead giveaway spotlight like arts to smooth or it does this and that but like for what your show year especially with their consistency okay it’s it scared like it’s it’s truly scary you take someone like experts for example and and you just want to emulate and style you want to
For cover and want to for
An illustration for movie poster right
You just you take a few more examples double or triple the near the amount that you that he used for consistency and all of a sudden you’re even better result i think it’s a minutes is tremendously scary because it’s so good this ai ethics spectrum demonstrates really well how exacts finally mccree is ethically
And morally the verse thing you can use generate the way i for especially when used to profit commercially from the generated images the in around executive vice president general counsel end chief trust officer at adobe said this in his interview with me like patel from the word there’s no such thing as style
Protection and copyright law right now that you can’t protect that it there’s that’s not a concept so we’ve we’ve introduced in the same senate testimony or for to earlier this idea of a federal anti impersonation right and the idea that is he would give artists or right to enforce against people who are intensely impersonating their worked for commercial gain
This is still possible to share anything online without worrying about feeding a generative a i’m more the with your work bench our professor of computer science and he steam at the university of chicago created to interesting tools that can help protect your digital images stored online polish it is trying to get help get some power back to the to the college at all
Owners on against people who don’t care about why something you don’t care about ownership we don’t care about had right
It is a small poison pill you can put inside your art
It works were similar to ways actually work glaze is modified what the i model sees in terms of artistic style night shade worse by changing what the a model she’s in terms of proposition
So in shadows yossi a cow in and near green pasture is the is a big leather handbag are sitting on the grassy hill
Right so
Each art piece can be up with a small poison pill
In such a way that if you of that gets collected and guess trained by the same model the lot lot of will start to give are confused about what is a cow a will think that a cow has a nice leathery handle and you know shiny buckles on and those holiday ai is not only saturating the internet when unreliable see on
Tenth that’s free to access but also in the form of paid content here is an example of a fake art book that is advertised as a compelling and extensive guidebook on drawing people my in reality it is a collection of generated images and generated taxed with close to zero value
To anyone interested in learning to draw fellow you tube or jessica drew draw was made a video about this just goes to show the moral ethical ambiguity of ai now and how it seem how is impacting addis i could have private that ninety five us dollars
To the people who
Who’s style that was based on or was used yamato bought chase got campbell have a draw book you know which i have bought some of those i am pretty sure this is just one of many examples of feig books out there just imagine you are learning to drive and you get scammed to learn from the feet book or you get a storybook for you
Your child that turns out to be a i generated with he didn’t flows that was secretly influence your child’s imagination or understanding of the world oh wait this already happened how can you protect yourself from fake books only by being extremely vigilant but it is going to get harder and harder to defray
Cheat generated books from real ones as a i models and workflows improved but it’s not just books that are all kinds of generated digital products already out there sites like art station are full of stuff like this massive collections of image references of something very specific like
A stylized the werewolf hat
There is a small mention that this product is made with the help of i meaning is nothing more than a library of curated generated images at least here they were not lying about the use of ai stock size are also flooded we generated images to see the scale of proliferation it’s worth checking the
Ratio between really is compared to generated images on some of the popular stock sites shutterstock for instance currently has around five million a i generated images which sounds like a lot but it only amounts to one point fifteen percent of it’s entire library compacted this free beak went all
It with a images a staggering forty two point seven percent out of their one hundred and twenty one million stock images are generated i have to give it to them do that the are being completely transparent about this and they make it super convenient to filter for ai images even based on leech model day
Generated in and whether their original prompt is available or not
Out of the four hundred million stock images currently on it’ll be stuck ten point one percent are a i generated contributors have to indicate is that image was created using gay i tools and whether people or property in the images are fictional here is one of their guidelines for generative vi content don’t submit
Content created using proms containing other artists names or created using proms otherwise intended to copy and other artist and most interesting thing is that adobe decided to train that generates model adobe firefly on a unique dataset made up of adobe stop images along with or
Only license work and public domain clinton were copyright has expired i stopped by getty images also introduce their own generative ai solution in september two thousand and twenty three partnering with and vidya which similarly to it’ll be firefly was exclusively trained on their own stock library these two exam
Polls adobe and getty prove that generative ai models can work without stealing millions of images and be transparent about that training data large stock sites like these were in a unique position that they were sitting on a gold mine from a deep learning point of view
They have a huge library of mostly high quality and high resolution images with descriptive titles and tags added by the contributors to make their images easier to find at the moment when comparing adobe firefly been meet your new for instance it’s a clear when in most cases for me journey in terms of the
Equality and reality some of the output however adobe is undeniably the more ethical model out of the to flip normals is another great example of a digital marketplace aim that three the artists were the founders morton and henning made it clear that contributors can upload and sell of vide were i
The of content as long as it’s not a i generated any ai art uploaded even if given away for free will be taken down relying mainly on generate the i to make money is not going to last long even if the creator is going to try to hide the fact that they used a i
On one hand it is unethical using the journey similar to using torrent site selling work heavily relying on generated images is even worse however it is like selling stuff that you downloaded from torrent sites the creators of ai tools are not directly involved in the act of plagiarism
The only provide the framework or week or for it on the other hand are created with ai is super accessible anyone can do it which means pretty much everyone will use it eventually it reminds me of google and other search engines when they first came out in the mid nineties and using
Them to find answers to your questions was like magic it seemed like a unique skill for a while but then it became the norm and allergies as normal to use a search engine as breeding having amazing cameras on mobile devices didn’t automatically turn all of us into professional photographers also randomly to
Making thousands of photos every day may still not result in any outstanding images generating images videos music three the objects and everything else that will be possible in the future will quickly lose it’s novelty and hype and the well you have generated art will plummet jake parker cause generative ai
A new and incredibly successful form of industrialized art that quantity affordability and speed is the priority over quality and skill previous successful examples of industrialized art art stock sites fiber and social media platforms like been trust instagram tick tock
The company’s behind social platforms are beating users the pretty pictures and videos harvesting their attention and selling it to advertisers the a serving up compact thumbnail sized are on a conveyor belt what’s worse is that these social platforms that already saturated with the ai images and soon a
Ai videos will follow turning them into a minefield if you’re looking for authentic content compared to these other examples of industrialized art generative ai takes things to a whole new level
It is at peak example of consumerism is like the fast food version of art it’s available to everyone is cheap but it is not good for you my fast food is negatively affecting your physical condition ai art is affecting your mind and how you perceive things that you see looking at generator
Images is nominee your senses and distorting your perception of reality remember when a piece of art was experience by staring at it for several minutes and appreciating all it’s details and imperfections trying to learn it’s meanings and mysteries the thoughts and emotions the artist was trying
To capture generative images on the other hand serve our impatient society perfectly the high wire door trying to think that looking at anything for more than two seconds feels like a waste of time and to be frank that is actually to about most a i art what humans what is like the
Short cut but biologically we don’t want to do work we don’t want to do hard things because while me we burn more calories and if we don’t have to we all want to do that if there was a pill that overnight you would get jacked you go for be your skin you are fat guy to like actually like henry campbell in the which are kind of level and you’ll be like sweet
I was done i don’t have to spend ten years of my life and five hours at a gym per day like a you would you would just be there is almost we have that
If you have a button to get jacked with in art
Like what’s the point of things right
The real appreciation of art comes from where you in the process of the artist but just a time and effort it took them to create a specific piece of our but that entire life experience generative a i removed the process from creation and makes people believe that it offers a shortcut to acquire artistic skill
As and experience the actual act of taking a great photo requires much less time than creating a painting of the same subject and he could also be considered a shortcut to achieve the same composition however taking great photos still relies on a lot of skills and practice compared to writing prompt imagine that you huh
An idea for a painting and you describe it to your friend you also tell her that you don’t think you have the time were skills to create it what you would love to see someone else painting it next time you meet your friends shows you a painting that closely resembles what you described she tells you that your idea inspires her and that she work
On it for several days now would you consider yourself to be the artist in this situation this is the same relation between a user and degenerative ai to where the ai is the friend who does the actual work based on your prompt another way to think about this is to imagine a game where do you have two options in the main menu
To start the game or to see the end of the game the first option would require you to spend dozens of hours of play time to reach the ending if you decide to choose the second option you could save all that time and effort but would the ending mean anything to you then not only you wouldn’t fully understand what’s happening but you
Wouldn’t have any emotional ties to any of the characters are events is a i are not just a new type of digital art which when it first became available was considered to be a shortcut to creating art and was looked down on by traditional artists most people handed the misconception of digital are being somewhat see
Similar to generative images were you just push a few buttons and a great image bob sapp but compared to a i art digital art is made by hand and requires a lot of skill to do well most ai artists already look at traditional and digital artists as dinosaurs and seeing gender
Originally i is just another tool and those who want embrace it will fall behind but most of them don’t realize is that without an ai tool they wouldn’t be able to even come close to that generated images while pre ai artists would be able to make amazing got pretty much with any tool you put in their hands
Some some people who have who have been into generative a i when they’re southern a journey or does database
They stop using it right away
Because a realized what implications were in the understood that wasn’t their skill
It was other people skills and they just
They they understood the the more implications right other people
Just turn a blind eye and kept going because there was too painful to understand what was happening and they just wanted to keep spiking their dopamine and they want to stay in these
The communities without thinking to critically right
Are going to the generalizing but a lot of people were using these image models never knew who any of us were before
Which means that their interest in art wasn’t that good
It never one that gave to find out who kim jong ii was your who were because he was who john singer sargent was like not about right
There was no real interest this just became junk food
Yeah it’s and it’s it’s interest based on dopamine accessibility and addiction
Right and is causing harm here is another little experiment for you let’s find a few great examples of generated images from me journey and compared the complexity and sophistication of promised used to generate them is there a correlation between how detail that prompted and quality of the generate
Image in most cases there isn’t which proves that there is a huge factor of luck and randomness involved in generative ai art democratization of art is an interesting but flawed concept most ai artists who believe in this sentiment however would still prefer to own copyrights for that
Generated images they don’t mind exploiting other artists‘ work but they won their work to be marketable and profit from it there is a big divide between the ai artists and non ai artists or as harvey lopez founder of magnification likes to call them the anti ai cluster the art community has
Always been welcoming and helpful to anyone interested to get started or gained skills i hate to see this on justify hatred towards traditional and digital artists as if they were holding on to their secrets and acting as gatekeepers thinking that finally now with generative ai anyone can become an artist
A lot of people look at this movement as a revolution where the smell be artists are finally getting what they deserve but in reality nothing can be further from the tooth at the moment the main reason why big brands and companies are careful about adopting generated images and videos in their communication is that ai are cannot be
Copyrighted the us copyright office noted that image generators produce images in an unpredictable way and thus cannot be considered creative or inventive tightening in a prompt having center of a i treat the image building that up with his copyrightable by itself
Because we think that the last step expression is being done by the i know you you’re taking your prob jury think they’re riding a bicycle the a eyes choosing in the first answers were kind of bear that see the paying all the things that are supposed to be the expression that the artist as post have in order to get a copyright so
We think that just typing in our prompt is probably not going to create a copyrightable expression the copyright law is quite clear that human authorship is required for copyright adobe’s content authenticity initiative and content credentials were created to enable creators to add extra information about themselves and their creative power
Oh says directly to their content in the form of a new kind of temporary then met to data this could be a solution for proving the ratio between the work achieve by a i and the human artist but we will have to see how widely will be accepted and how effective it will become if you’re creative professional you’re never satisfied with what comes out
One of these are the i models because it’s not exactly what you want it right you’re always going to make it wherever your visit this this this is a beer for is the first step in the creative process and all the other stats are going to be comfortable the opinion on generative ai is extremely divisive and i hope if you ended up watching this video this far
You can see why most artists agree that they would consider using ai is the training data was clear of copyright violations using ai is similar to tapping into the collective imagination of human kind and it can be useful for i the asian for the first time you can brainstorm on her own
And get surprising ideas you may have never thought of creativity is fueled by the unexpected an ai has no fear of failing so it will also make surprising mistakes that can lead to break through his and brilliant new ideas
Sam harper said that he i aren’t makes glorious mistakes and therefore makes glorious art he also said that he i is in it’s early days and it’s making lots and lots of mistakes these are the days of ai being a good artist once it gets too good at doing what it was designed for it will know
Longer make mistakes
One question that i’m particularly interested in is whether there is a way to make a completely ethical generative ai to i will be has an ai ethics program for instance following three guiding principles accountability responsibility and transparency which spells art by the way but if go
Can be argued that shoving all of it will be stuck into a training data set was not all that ethical sees the contributors only found out about this after the images were already used to train firefly it is also fairly easy to find generated images with copyrighted materials on famous eyepiece on adobe’s
Doc i’m pretty sure these knee and nickelodeon will not be happy to find out that adobe’s licensing their intellectual properties i am sure that that will be doing his best to filter these out but it’s not an easy task when the contributors are trying to be tricky when naming these assets while i hope will happen in the near future is
That the law will define the requirements for generative ai i datasets so what would an ideal ethical legislation look like for generative ai training datasets to be one hundred percent transparent only use work in a dataset by artists who gave their consent roy
Ortiz and compensation should be paid out the artists who opted in generated images need to be catalogued an easy to track direct or exact time mimicry should not be allowed perhaps the combination of minimum to artist styles could work or simply completely banned the usage of names of
Creators generated images can only be used for reference purposes and fully a i generated work should not be acceptable as a finished concept the uk house of lords publication on generative ai states that the government should prioritize fairness and responsible innovation in
Must resolve disputes definitely including through of dt legislation if needed and power rights holders to check if their data has been used without permission and invest in large high quality training data sets to encourage tech firms to use license material this is a very promising direction and
I hope it won’t take long before this gets more traction around the world the real danger of generative ai is the effect it’s having on up and coming artists many talents may have been lost a ready to discouragement by generative ai many my boss the same question why should i spend over it ten thousand hours perfecting my skills
And wrapping my head around complex and confusing things like anatomy perspective and color theory when i can just write a few words and get dozens of beautiful generated images i already assume that every day i’m seeing several a images that i’m not clocking right that the problem with ai is that your only noticing them
Ones that you know this right the ones that are have sufficient quality you’re just scrolling right past you know you’re just accepting them for what they are and i have seen
Groups of professional artist you know in a sort of formalize way try to see how much can they identify ai art and you know who can get a perfect score right and in a considerable group of artists you know maybe twenty or something like that there’s only one person who will clock them all you know their and most
Everybody will make some amount of mistakes and not just one so i’m deeply deeply concerned about this i think this problem is only gonna get worse and in it’s bad for the artists and it’s also bad for the atmosphere around art online that the issue with stuff
This is that
Once there’s enough of this online and i think we’re basically already there you’ll just start assuming most stuff is a i am when that happens we’re on a slippery slope that really don’t know how we come back from on shot happens that’s a very bad position to put new are into an artist who are trying to break in and get popular it’s horrible
To think that i would be less inclined to recognize them as a great talent just because i’m like what where’d you come from and if you came out a know where you’re probably i you know you don’t have a natural progression where were you been it’s like that is a horrible atmosphere to have around are sharing and the the and and social media
I think that’s only going to make us more insular like you said it’s going to make us more inclined to
Only can only interact with the people that we already follow you know what’s going to be much harder to on board someone new as a favorite artist or great artist you know think about the young people right now i get so many comments and messages from people telling me how they feel hopeless there are literally kids out there aren’t babies were in
Art schools to going through a for your program to hopefully work in the industry and they feel like there’s no hope for them if you’re an artist with the voice with the platform you don’t have to do it for yourself to it for the younger generation there are so many people young people who are counting on you i don’t know about you guys but i want a future where there’s an option to pursue the passion of art as a cool
We’re i want to future with the kids want to dwell want to create what make things that mean something to them stand for coop ankle or pro coal in the dark my podcast sad drawing is a visual language it’s a form of communication and just because a robot can speak doesn’t mean we should stop speaking jan
Narrative ai models are devouring art in order to come close to the greatness created by real artists but they will never have a soul or feelings to express by do think that also at some point if not already
The people and a lot of companies are coming to the realization that a team of skill matters creativity really does matter you know a lot of for covers a lot of publishers a lot of companies greater companies already instituting nellie i policies how long does it take for ai to become the the sort of the bottom line and minute
All version of what we can get and and if you want something that is really surprising and really thought provoking and challenger you’ll still need to come back to humans and at that point i don’t know how many human artists will be still thriving but i do think at some point human artist and we value higher than yard if not already than that a as always
Can the second rate is always gonna be the cheaper version when you can hire someone was real skill and creativity you go back on the journey get this the our something that you can have for fifty cents on and so there’s gonna be news cause i so how do we tell the difference i do identify real human skill vs something that just came out of a yeah okay
So predictor to that will be interesting to see how it develops and and on tools come up with to turn to tell the difference identify something as you’re treating me creativity viruses or coffee one of the best things that happened recently when you tube that demonstrates the beauty and importance of discipline and hard work
Is the amazing our journey of one of you to the biggest influencers pew the pie
Felix decided he was going to improve his drawing skills and drew at first for thirty days then continued his challenge deal he reach a hundred days he’s progress passion and dedication is so inspiring and sense a great example for those discouraged from learning to do some companies like procreate
Are taking a from standpoint that the are not going to into use anything to do regenerative generative ai to their products the at a small team passionate about art and creation and the all these value their users over making profit
Dad product procreate has been the number one best seller app on the app store for i pad for over five years and now they’re latest ep procreate dreams became close second on the best seller chart they are a prime example of a tech company who believes in providing people tools to express themselves easy
Silly but they realized that he i is not about making the process of creation easier it is about automating or replacing the process itself be putting the whole crew take to future of humanity and riskier because another issue with this is not just that you’re good to see want to be an illustrator and know you go straight to do
During this connoisseurs you you’re skipping the important steps of learning about the art fundamentals it’s not just art fundamentals as learning perspective a learning construction and color theory is it’s like you go through a journey will you learning these things like you’re you’re not just go to school and a you like you know you don’t enter to school as a sustained person’s you leave the school as because the
Was just an emotional during their what does it mean to even be creative were to express yourself that is what is what’s at stake when you’re dealing with technology like this
General tv i he’s he have to stay there is no stopping or slowing down this technology should you use generative ai for your creative work i will let you decide that but whatever you do i encourage you to use this technology carefully
I’m hopeful that generative a i will evolve and become more ethical in the future but until then we have to be very selective in how we use it thank you for watching don’t forget to share your opinion in the comments and i hope to see you in the next one